[gpfsug-discuss] Quotas and non-existant users

[P Serocka]

;-)


Ignore my other message on mmcheckquota then.

On 2014 Nov 27. md, at 18:02 st, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 09:47 +0000, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 10:14 +0000, Laurence Alexander Hurst wrote:
>>> Hmm, mmrepquota is reporting no files owned by any of the users in
>>> question.  I¹ll see if `find` disagrees.
>>>  They have the default fileset
>>> user quotas applied, so they¹re not users we¹ve edited to grant quota
>>> extensions to.  We have had a problem (which IBM have acknowledged, iirc)
>>> whereby it is not possible to reset a user¹s quota back to the default if
>>> it has been modified, perhaps this is related?  I¹ll see if `find` turns
>>> anything up or I¹ll raise a ticket with IBM and see what they think.
>>> 
>>> I¹ve pulled out a single example, but all 75 users I have are the same.
>>> 
>>> mmrepquota gpfs | grep 8695
>>> 8695       nbu        USR               0          0 5368709120          0
>>>    none |        0       0        0        0     none
>>> 8695       bb         USR               0          0 1073741824          0
>>>    none |        0       0        0        0     none
>>> 
>> 
>> While the number of files and usage is zero look at those "in doubt"
>> numbers.
> 
> Ignore that those are quota numbers. Hard when the column headings are
> missing. 
> 
> Anyway a "Homer Simpson" momentum coming up...
> 
> Simple answer really remove the quotas for those users in those file
> sets (I am presuming they are per fileset user hard limits). They are
> sticking around in mmrepquota because they have a hard limit set. D'oh!
> 
> JAB.
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan A. Buzzard                 Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
> Fife, United Kingdom.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss