[gpfsug-discuss] AFM synced directory size
DIETER GORECKI
dieter.gorecki at atos.net
Fri Jun 2 11:12:25 BST 2023
Hi,
I am currently doing an AFM based synchronization between 2 GPFS filesystems using a multicluster connection.
It works quite well apart from the fact that on cache FS we noticed directory take 4x the size they have on home FS:
[root at node ~]# stat /newfs/fileset/dir
File: /newfs/fileset/dir
Size: 16384 Blocks: 32 IO Block: 262144 directory
Device: 2eh/46d Inode: 14893057 Links: 25
Access: (2775/drwxrwsr-x) Uid: ( xxxx/ UNKNOWN) Gid: ( yyyy/ UNKNOWN)
Access: 2023-06-02 08:09:25.659095673 +0000
Modify: 2023-01-27 08:56:09.636343000 +0000
Change: 2023-06-01 13:22:08.972571000 +0000
Birth: -
[root at node ~]# stat /oldFS/fileset/dir
File: /oldFS/fileset/dir
Size: 4096 Blocks: 1 IO Block: 131072 directory
Device: 32h/50d Inode: 8590516352 Links: 25
Access: (2775/drwxrwsr-x) Uid: ( xxxx/ UNKNOWN) Gid: ( yyyy/ UNKNOWN)
Access: 2023-06-02 09:09:40.483041330 +0000
Modify: 2023-01-27 08:56:09.636343000 +0000
Change: 2023-01-27 08:56:09.644167000 +0000
Birth: -
I saw somewhere that AFM extended attributes should take around 200 bytes so I am a bit puzzled on why this much difference here.
I disables the AFM relationship between synced filesets but the size stay the same.
If I create a directory manually on the new filesystem, size is 4k as expected.
Any idea why we get this behaviour ? GPFS version is 5.1.6.1 on new cluster, 5.1.2.8 on old cluster.
Thanks,
Dieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230602/5a4fae46/attachment.htm>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list