[gpfsug-discuss] spanning datacenter to AWS

Frederick Stock stockf at us.ibm.com
Wed Feb 22 19:00:40 GMT 2023


Bill, if my memory serves me correctly, there was a fix done in later versions of Scale (there may be an efix available) for the situation you described.  Notably, Scale was not properly propagating information about files created through NFS.  I suggest you contact Scale support to see if they can provide more details, as well as options for obtaining the fix, assuming my mind has not completely failed me on this issue 😊

Fred

Fred Stock, Spectrum Scale Development Advocacy
stockf at us.ibm.com<mailto:stockf at us.ibm.com> | 720-430-8821



From: gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at gpfsug.org> on behalf of Bill Peters <WPeters at ATPCO.NET>
Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 12:53 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] spanning datacenter to AWS
Hello all, I’ve been on the mailing list for a few years but have not been active except my introduction email. We are having an issue I’d like to run past everyone and see if anyone has experience that may help. Currently using
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hello all,
I’ve been on the mailing list for a few years but have not been active except my introduction email.

We are having an issue I’d like to run past everyone and see if anyone has experience that may help.

Currently using Spectrum Scale Data Management Edition 5.1.1.0

Our Spectrum Scale cluster is running on Linux VMs on IBM z/VM. We have one application that
cannot support the z/VM architecture so we used to have those servers running on VMware in our
datacenter and those servers were client nodes in the Spectrum Scale cluster. This configuration
worked great. We recently retired VMWare and moved all that workload to AWS. Because this
was no longer on our LAN we thought it would be a good idea (IBM support also recommended it) to
use CES NFS rather than adding the AWS instances to the cluster. Since doing this we have seen
problems under high IO. Some NFS clients will try to access files that don’t seem to be there
resulting in file not found errors. We know the files have been created but the NFS clients can’t
see them. The read process runs successfully shortly after. We are not saturating our AWS
connection.

I haven’t seen any NFS tuning that looks like it would help, but that is an option I would be willing to try.
The other option I’m thinking about is just adding the NFS clients to the cluster. Has anyone spanned
datacenters like this?

Thanks, any help is appreciated.

-Bill



Bill Peters
Senior Platform Engineer
703-475-3386
wpeters at atpco.net<mailto:wpeters at atpco.net>


atpco.net
45005 Aviation Drive
Dulles, VA 20166


[A close up of a sign    Description automatically generated]<http://bit.ly/35vlWu3>
[Title: Facebook - Description: Facebook icon]<https://www.facebook.com/atpconews/>  [Title: Twitter - Description: Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/ATPCOnews>   [Title: LinkedIn - Description: LinkedIn icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/atpco/>








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230222/e6ea06dd/attachment-0005.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 17692 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230222/e6ea06dd/attachment-0020.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1266 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230222/e6ea06dd/attachment-0021.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1329 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230222/e6ea06dd/attachment-0022.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1378 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230222/e6ea06dd/attachment-0023.png>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list