[gpfsug-discuss] Fw: Re: 'force user' samba parameter not implemented

IBM Spectrum Scale scale at us.ibm.com
Thu Aug 26 19:15:30 BST 2021


Forwarding for Christof.  Please see below.

Regards, The Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you feel that your question can benefit other users of  Spectrum Scale
(GPFS), then please post it to the public IBM developerWroks Forum at
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/forum?id=11111111-0000-0000-0000-000000000479.


If your query concerns a potential software error in Spectrum Scale (GPFS)
and you have an IBM software maintenance contract please contact
1-800-237-5511 in the United States or your local IBM Service Center in
other countries.

The forum is informally monitored as time permits and should not be used
for priority messages to the Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team.
----- Forwarded by Doug Ledden/Austin/IBM on 08/26/2021 01:13 PM -----

From:	Christof Schmitt/Tucson/IBM at IBM
To:	gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
Cc:	gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
Date:	08/25/2021 05:22 PM
Subject:	[EXTERNAL] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'force user' samba parameter
            not implemented
Sent by:	gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org



Hi Paul,

> We are moving from our v4 SCALE install to a 5.0.5 SCALE install.
> We make extensive use of the ‘force user’ parameter in our cross
> protocol shares.
> I have just been informed, that although we can set the parameter
> using ‘net conf’ it isn’t implemented in the current version of
> Samba in v5.0.5 of SCALE.

This config option is not tested and not supported as part of Spectrum
Scale. Only SMB/Samba config parameters that are accessible through
the GUI or mmsmb CLI are officially supported. If you have a usecase
requiring support for additional Samba parameters, the proper way to
request support is through a RFE.

That said, i do not see why the Samba behavior would change here from
v4 to v5. If you want to debug this, i would suggest to recreate the
problem with this parameter in place while capturing a SMB trace
(mmprotocoltrace start smb). The SMB trace should then have sufficient
information to determine why the owner of the file is not as expected.

Regards,

Christof Schmitt
Software Engineer
IBM Systems, Spectrum Scale Development
+1 520 799 2469
christof.schmitt at us.ibm.com
@chsc Twitter

IBM


 ----- Original message -----
 From: "Paul Ward" <p.ward at nhm.ac.uk>
 Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
 To: "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
 Cc:
 Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] 'force user' samba parameter not
 implemented
 Date: Tue, Aug 24, 2021 3:04 AM

 Hi,

 We are moving from our v4 SCALE install to a 5.0.5 SCALE install.
 We make extensive use of the ‘force user’ parameter in our cross protocol
 shares.
 I have just been informed, that although we can set the parameter using
 ‘net conf’ it isn’t implemented in the current version of Samba in v5.0.5
 of SCALE.

 Has anyone else faced this issue, and what has been your workaround.


 Kindest regards,
 Paul

 Paul Ward
 TS Infrastructure Architect
 Natural History Museum
 T: 02079426450
 E: p.ward at nhm.ac.uk
 A picture containing drawingDescription automatically generated



 _______________________________________________
 gpfsug-discuss mailing list
 gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
 http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss


_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20210826/466f391f/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1D367310.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5356 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20210826/466f391f/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list