[gpfsug-discuss] Mounting filesystem on top of an existing filesystem

[Simon Thompson]

If it is a remote cluster mount from your clients (hopefully!), you might want to look at priority to order mounting of the file-systems. I don’t know what would happen if the overmounted file-system went away, you would likely want to test.

Simon

From: <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> on behalf of "marc.caubet at psi.ch" <marc.caubet at psi.ch>
Reply to: "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Date: Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 15:39
To: "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Mounting filesystem on top of an existing filesystem


Hi,



I have a filesystem holding many projects (i.e., mounted under /projects), each project is managed with filesets.

I have a new big project which should be placed on a separate filesystem (blocksize, replication policy, etc. will be different, and subprojects of it will be managed with filesets). Ideally, this filesystem should be mounted in /projects/newproject.



Technically, mounting a filesystem on top of an existing filesystem should be possible, but, is this discouraged for any reason? How GPFS would behave with that and is there a technical reason for avoiding this setup?

Another alternative would be independent mount point + symlink, but I really would prefer to avoid symlinks.



Thanks a lot,

Marc
_________________________________________________________
Paul Scherrer Institut
High Performance Computing & Emerging Technologies
Marc Caubet Serrabou
Building/Room: OHSA/014
Forschungsstrasse, 111
5232 Villigen PSI
Switzerland

Telephone: +41 56 310 46 67
E-Mail: marc.caubet at psi.ch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20201119/21c0ec6e/attachment-0002.htm>