[gpfsug-discuss] Filesystem access issues via CES NFS

[Talamo Ivano Giuseppe (PSI)]

Yes, thanks for the feedback. We already have a test cluster, so I guess we will go that way, just making sure to stay as close as possible to the production one.

Cheers,
Ivano

On 23.10.19, 13:20, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf of Jonathan Buzzard" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf of jonathan.buzzard at strath.ac.uk> wrote:

    On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 10:14 +0000, Simon Thompson wrote:
    > From our experience, you can generally upgrade the GPFS code node by
    > node, but the SMB code has to be identical on all nodes. So that's
    > basically a do it one day and cross your fingers it doesn't break
    > moment... but it is disruptive as well as you have to stop SMB to do
    > the upgrade. I think there is a long standing RFE open on this about
    > non disruptive SMB upgrades...
    > 
    
    My understanding is that the issue is the ctdb database suffers from
    basically being a "memory dump", so a change in the code can effect the
    database so all the nodes have to be the same. It's the same issue that
    historically plagued Microsoft Office file formats.
    
    Though of course you might get lucky and it just works. I have in the
    past in the days of role your own because there was no such thing as
    IBM provided Samba for GPFS done exactly that on several occasions.
    There was not warnings not to at the time...
    
    If you want to do testing before deployment a test cluster is the way
    forward.
    
    JAB.
    
    -- 
    Jonathan A. Buzzard                         Tel: +44141-5483420
    HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
    University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    gpfsug-discuss mailing list
    gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
    http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss