[gpfsug-discuss] A net new cluster

[Matt Cowan]

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Christopher Black wrote:
...
> Main reasoning of the new cluster for us is to be able to make a fully V19+ filesystem with
> sub-block allocation.
> 
> Our understanding from talking to IBM is that there is no way to upgrade a pool to be
> SBA-compatible, nor is it advisable to try to create a new pool or filesystem in same
> cluster and then migrate (partially because migrating between filesystems within a cluster
> with afm would require going through nfs stack afaik).
...

Could you just use policy to migrate to the new pool?  no afm required.

"partially because"... what are the other reasons?