[gpfsug-discuss] strange waiters + filesystem deadlock

Sven Oehme oehmes at gmail.com
Fri Mar 24 18:05:58 GMT 2017


was this filesystem creates with -n 5000 ? or was that changed later with
mmchfs ?
please send the mmlsconfig/mmlscluster output to me at oehmes at us.ibm.com



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:58 AM Aaron Knister <aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>
wrote:

> I feel a little awkward about posting wlists of IP's and hostnames on
> the mailing list (even though they're all internal) but I'm happy to
> send to you directly. I've attached both an lsfs and an mmdf output of
> the fs in question here since that may be useful for others to see. Just
> a note about disk d23_02_021-- it's been evacuated for several weeks now
> due to a hardware issue in the disk enclosure.
>
> The fs is rather full percentage wise (93%) but in terms of capacity
> there's a good amount free. 93% full of a 7PB filesystem still leaves
> 551T. Metadata, as you'll see, is 31% free (roughly 800GB).
>
> The fs has 40M inodes allocated and 12M free.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On 3/24/17 1:41 PM, Sven Oehme wrote:
> > ok, that seems a different problem then i was thinking.
> > can you send output of mmlscluster, mmlsconfig, mmlsfs all ?
> > also are you getting close to fill grade on inodes or capacity on any of
> > the filesystems ?
> >
> > sven
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:34 AM Aaron Knister <aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov
> > <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>> wrote:
> >
> >     Here's the screenshot from the other node with the high cpu
> utilization.
> >
> >     On 3/24/17 1:32 PM, Aaron Knister wrote:
> >     > heh, yep we're on sles :)
> >     >
> >     > here's a screenshot of the fs manager from the deadlocked
> filesystem. I
> >     > don't think there's an nsd server or manager node that's running
> full
> >     > throttle across all cpus. There is one that's got relatively high
> CPU
> >     > utilization though (300-400%). I'll send a screenshot of it in a
> sec.
> >     >
> >     > no zimon yet but we do have other tools to see cpu utilization.
> >     >
> >     > -Aaron
> >     >
> >     > On 3/24/17 1:22 PM, Sven Oehme wrote:
> >     >> you must be on sles as this segfaults only on sles to my
> knowledge :-)
> >     >>
> >     >> i am looking for a NSD or manager node in your cluster that runs
> at 100%
> >     >> cpu usage.
> >     >>
> >     >> do you have zimon deployed to look at cpu utilization across your
> nodes ?
> >     >>
> >     >> sven
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:08 AM Aaron Knister <
> aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>
> >     >> <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>>>
> wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >>     Hi Sven,
> >     >>
> >     >>     Which NSD server should I run top on, the fs manager? If so
> the
> >     >> CPU load
> >     >>     is about 155%. I'm working on perf top but not off to a great
> >     >> start...
> >     >>
> >     >>     # perf top
> >     >>         PerfTop:    1095 irqs/sec  kernel:61.9%  exact:  0.0%
> [1000Hz
> >     >>     cycles],  (all, 28 CPUs)
> >     >>
> >     >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >>
> >     >>     Segmentation fault
> >     >>
> >     >>     -Aaron
> >     >>
> >     >>     On 3/24/17 1:04 PM, Sven Oehme wrote:
> >     >>     > while this is happening  run top and see if there is very
> high cpu
> >     >>     > utilization at this time on the NSD Server.
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     > if there is , run perf top (you might need to install perf
> >     >> command) and
> >     >>     > see if the top cpu contender is a spinlock . if so send a
> >     >> screenshot of
> >     >>     > perf top as i may know what that is and how to fix.
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     > sven
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:43 AM Aaron Knister
> >     >> <aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>
> >     <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>>
> >     >>     > <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:
> aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>
> >     >> <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov <mailto:aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov>>>>
> wrote:
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     Since yesterday morning we've noticed some deadlocks on
> one
> >     >> of our
> >     >>     >     filesystems that seem to be triggered by writing to it.
> The
> >     >> waiters on
> >     >>     >     the clients look like this:
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     0x19450B0 (   6730) waiting 2063.294589599 seconds,
> >     >> SyncHandlerThread:
> >     >>     >     on ThCond 0x1802585CB10 (0xFFFFC9002585CB10)
> >     >> (InodeFlushCondVar), reason
> >     >>     >     'waiting for the flush flag to commit metadata'
> >     >>     >     0x7FFFDA65E200 (  22850) waiting 0.000246257 seconds,
> >     >>     >     AllocReduceHelperThread: on ThCond 0x7FFFDAC7FE28
> >     >> (0x7FFFDAC7FE28)
> >     >>     >     (MsgRecordCondvar), reason 'RPC wait' for
> >     >> allocMsgTypeRelinquishRegion
> >     >>     >     on node 10.1.52.33 <c0n3271>
> >     >>     >     0x197EE70 (   6776) waiting 0.000198354 seconds,
> >     >>     >     FileBlockWriteFetchHandlerThread: on ThCond
> 0x7FFFF00CD598
> >     >>     >     (0x7FFFF00CD598) (MsgRecordCondvar), reason 'RPC wait'
> for
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion on node 10.1.52.33 <c0n3271>
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     (10.1.52.33/c0n3271 <http://10.1.52.33/c0n3271>
> >     <http://10.1.52.33/c0n3271>
> >     >>     <http://10.1.52.33/c0n3271> is the fs manager
> >     >>     >     for the filesystem in question)
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     there's a single process running on this node writing
> to the
> >     >> filesystem
> >     >>     >     in question (well, trying to write, it's been blocked
> doing
> >     >> nothing for
> >     >>     >     half an hour now). There are ~10 other client nodes in
> this
> >     >> situation
> >     >>     >     right now. We had many more last night before the
> problem
> >     >> seemed to
> >     >>     >     disappear in the early hours of the morning and now its
> back.
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     Waiters on the fs manager look like this. While the
> >     >> individual waiter is
> >     >>     >     short it's a near constant stream:
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF60003540 (   8269) waiting 0.001151588 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >> (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0)
> >     >>     >     (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF601C8860 (  20606) waiting 0.001115712 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRelinquishRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >>     >     (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0) (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF91C10080 (  14723) waiting 0.000959649 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >> (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0)
> >     >>     >     (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFFB03C2910 (  12636) waiting 0.000769611 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >> (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0)
> >     >>     >     (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF8C092850 (  18215) waiting 0.000682275 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRelinquishRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >>     >     (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0) (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF9423F730 (  12652) waiting 0.000641915 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >> (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0)
> >     >>     >     (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF9422D770 (  12625) waiting 0.000494256 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRequestRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >> (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0)
> >     >>     >     (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >     0x7FFF9423E310 (  12651) waiting 0.000437760 seconds,
> Msg
> >     >> handler
> >     >>     >     allocMsgTypeRelinquishRegion: on ThMutex 0x1802163A2E0
> >     >>     >     (0xFFFFC9002163A2E0) (AllocManagerMutex)
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     I don't know if this data point is useful but both
> yesterday
> >     >> and today
> >     >>     >     the metadata NSDs for this filesystem have had a
> constant
> >     >> aggregate
> >     >>     >     stream of 25MB/s 4kop/s reads during each episode (very
> low
> >     >> latency
> >     >>     >     though so I don't believe the storage is a bottleneck
> here).
> >     >> Writes are
> >     >>     >     only a few hundred ops and didn't strike me as odd.
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     I have a PMR open for this but I'm curious if folks have
> >     >> seen this in
> >     >>     >     the wild and what it might mean.
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     -Aaron
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >     --
> >     >>     >     Aaron Knister
> >     >>     >     NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2)
> >     >>     >     Goddard Space Flight Center
> >     >>     >     (301) 286-2776 <tel:(301)%20286-2776>
> <tel:(301)%20286-2776>
> >     <tel:(301)%20286-2776>
> >     >>     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >>     >     gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     >>     >     gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <
> http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     >> <http://spectrumscale.org> <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     >>     >     http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     >
> >     >>     > _______________________________________________
> >     >>     > gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     >>     > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <
> http://spectrumscale.org> <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     >>     > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >     >>     >
> >     >>
> >     >>     --
> >     >>     Aaron Knister
> >     >>     NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2)
> >     >>     Goddard Space Flight Center
> >     >>     (301) 286-2776 <tel:(301)%20286-2776> <tel:(301)%20286-2776>
> >     >>     _______________________________________________
> >     >>     gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     >>     gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <http://spectrumscale.org>
> <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     >>     http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     >> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     >> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >     >>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >     >
> >
> >     --
> >     Aaron Knister
> >     NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2)
> >     Goddard Space Flight Center
> >     (301) 286-2776 <tel:(301)%20286-2776>
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> >     gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <http://spectrumscale.org>
> >     http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
> >
>
> --
> Aaron Knister
> NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2)
> Goddard Space Flight Center
> (301) 286-2776
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20170324/c5111d6e/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list