[gpfsug-discuss] Policy rule to list files based on access time

[Sobey, Richard A]

Thanks all, managed to rerun the policy with the additional list options (kb_allocated etc) and verified that indeed there are at least 60000 files with the same name that are 0 bytes, and more besides.

Now my paranoia is setting in that somehow these files are all corrupted 😊

Cheers
Richard

From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Sobey, Richard A
Sent: 02 December 2017 18:53
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Policy rule to list files based on access time

Thank you all for your replies. I will take a look at them on Monday. And reply individually where I need to..
Richard
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Marc A Kaplan <makaplan at us.ibm.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 6:03:25 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Policy rule to list files based on access time

You might want to look at FILE_SIZE.  KB_ALLOCATED will be 0 if the file data fits into the inode.

You might also want to use SIZE(FILE_SIZE) in the policy LIST rule, this will cause the KB_HIT and KB_CHOSEN numbers to be the sum of FILE_SIZEs instead of the default SIZE(KB_ALLOCATED).

--marc of GPFS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20171205/9593f4f0/attachment-0002.htm>