[gpfsug-discuss] Data replication and fileset quotas

Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services) S.J.Thompson at bham.ac.uk
Wed May 4 08:11:18 BST 2016




Yes, this correct (I think there was some discussion on the mailing list a little while back).

The quota is the space used on disk, so if you run compression its the compressed size, tape hsm don't count until you recall them.

I assume mcstore is the same, I.e. Only counts on recall, but I haven't tested this.

Simon

--

Simon Thompson

Research Computing Team, IT Services

+44 121 415 8675

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Banister [bbanister at jumptrading.com<mailto:bbanister at jumptrading.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 09:33 PM GMT Standard Time
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Data replication and fileset quotas

Yes, I believe that is the case due to the fact that every file is replicated therefore taking twice as much space within the file system.
-Bryan

From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Buterbaugh, Kevin L
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:27 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Data replication and fileset quotas

Hi again all,

I have another question on a completely different topic and therefore I decided it was better to send two separate e-mails.

For a number of years now we have had a GPFS filesystem where we use filesets and set fileset quotas.  Data replication is set to one.  I understand how that all works.

We are creating another GPFS filesystem where we intend to also use filesets and fileset quotas, but set data replication to two.  Based on my experience with data replication on a filesystem that doesn’t use filesets, I am expecting that setting data replication to two means that I will need to double the quota for each fileset (i.e. if a group has bought 5 TB of space I’ll need to set their fileset quota to 10 TB) but haven’t found where that is explicitly documented.  Is that correct?

Thanks again, all…

Kevin

—
Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator
Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education
Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu> - (615)875-9633




________________________________

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and to please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request or solicitation of any kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem or perform any type of transaction of a financial product.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20160504/34c11a8d/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list