[gpfsug-discuss] Small cluster

[Zachary Giles]

Sven,
What about the stability of the new protocol nodes vs the old cNFS? If you
remember, back in the day, cNFS would sometimes have a problem and reboot
the whole server itself. Obviously this was problematic if it's one of the
few servers running your cluster. I assume this is different now with the
Protocol Servers?


On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Marc A Kaplan <makaplan at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Indeed it seems to just add overhead and expense to split what can be done
> by one node over two nodes!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>


-- 
Zach Giles
zgiles at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20160305/d1606263/attachment-0002.htm>