[gpfsug-discuss] metadata replication question

Barry Evans bevans at pixitmedia.com
Sun Jan 3 22:10:21 GMT 2016


Can all 4 NSD servers see all existing storwize arrays across both DC's?

Cheers,
Barry


On 03/01/2016 21:56, Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services) 
wrote:
> I currently have 4 NSD servers in a cluster, two pairs in two data centres. Data and metadata replication is currently set to 2 with metadata sitting on sas drivers in a storewise array. I also have a vm floating between the two data centres to guarantee quorum in one only in the event of split brain.
>
> Id like to add some ssd for metadata.
>
> Should I:
>
> Add raid1 ssd to the storewise?
>
> Add local ssd to the nsd servers?
>
> If I did the second, should I
>   add ssd to each nsd server (not raid 1) and set each in a different failure group and make metadata replication of 4.
>   add ssd to each nsd server as raid 1, use the same failure group for each data centre pair?
>   add ssd to each nsd server not raid 1, use the dame failure group for each data centre pair?
>
> Or something else entirely?
>
> What I want so survive is a split data centre situation or failure of a single nsd server at any point...
>
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> I'm thinking the first of the nsd local options uses 4 writes as does the second, but each nsd server then has a local copy of the metatdata locally and ssd fails, in which case it should be able to get it from its local partner pair anyway (with readlocalreplica)?
>
> Id like a cost competitive solution that gives faster performance than the current sas drives.
>
> Was also thinking I might add an ssd to each nsd server for system.log pool for hawc as well...
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

-- 

Barry Evans
Technical Director & Co-Founder
Pixit Media
Mobile: +44 (0)7950 666 248
http://www.pixitmedia.com


-- 

This email is confidential in that it is intended for the exclusive 
attention of the addressee(s) indicated. If you are not the intended 
recipient, this email should not be read or disclosed to any other person. 
Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your 
computer system. Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the 
company from which this email was sent and, whilst to the best of our 
knowledge no viruses or defects exist, no responsibility can be accepted 
for any loss or damage arising from its receipt or subsequent use of this 
email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20160103/5d463c6d/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list