[gpfsug-discuss] GPFS FPO

Brian Marshall mimarsh2 at vt.edu
Tue Aug 23 12:56:22 BST 2016


Aaron,

Do you have experience running this on native GPFS?  The docs say Lustre
and any NFS filesystem.

Thanks,
Brian

On Aug 22, 2016 10:37 PM, "Aaron Knister" <aaron.s.knister at nasa.gov> wrote:

> Yes, indeed. Note that these are my personal opinions.
>
> It seems to work quite well and it's not terribly hard to set up or get
> running. That said, if you've got a traditional HPC cluster with reasonably
> good bandwidth (and especially if your data is already on the HPC cluster)
> I wouldn't bother with FPO and just use something like magpie (
> https://github.com/LLNL/magpie) to run your hadoopy workload on GPFS on
> your traditional HPC cluster. I believe FPO (and by extension data
> locality) is important when the available bandwidth between your clients
> and servers/disks (in a traditional GPFS environment) is less than the
> bandwidth available within a node (e.g. between your local disks and the
> host CPU).
>
> -Aaron
>
> On 8/22/16 10:23 PM, Brian Marshall wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any experiences to share (good or bad) about setting up
>> and utilizing FPO for hadoop compute on top of GPFS?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>>
>>
> --
> Aaron Knister
> NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2)
> Goddard Space Flight Center
> (301) 286-2776
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20160823/b24639c4/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list