[gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with thinly-provisioned volumes?
Marc A Kaplan
makaplan at us.ibm.com
Tue Dec 22 22:44:08 GMT 2015
You write "storage device incorrectly reporting...". Please give an
example. What numbers do you expect? Why? What numbers are you seeing?
Exactly because of what is highlighted in red "GPFS does not communicate
block deallocation events...." -- I would not expect deleting files to
change
"storage device report [of]... usage allocations". The device saw GPFS
write to some data blocks and ... nothing after that ... so the device
still "thinks" those blocks are in use.
Indeed GPFS may re-use/re-write those blocks in the future when they
become part of another file" OTOH GPFS may not do that until it has
written to every other block that is addressable from its point of view.
GPFS has no idea that the thin provisioning layer exists and might favor
re-using one disk address over using another.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trim_(computing)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20151222/e57b5e6a/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list