[gpfsug-discuss] Using HAWC (write cache)
Oesterlin, Robert
Robert.Oesterlin at nuance.com
Wed Aug 26 13:27:36 BST 2015
Yep. Mine do too, initially. It seems after a number of days, they get marked as removed. In any case IBM confirmed it. So… tread lightly.
Bob Oesterlin
Sr Storage Engineer, Nuance Communications
507-269-0413
From: <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at gpfsug.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at gpfsug.org>> on behalf of "Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)"
Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 7:23 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Using HAWC (write cache)
Hmm mine seem to be working which I created this morning (on a client node):
mmdiag --lroc
=== mmdiag: lroc ===
LROC Device(s): '0A1E017755DD7808#/dev/sdb1;' status Running
Cache inodes 1 dirs 1 data 1 Config: maxFile 0 stubFile 0
Max capacity: 190732 MB, currently in use: 4582 MB
Statistics from: Tue Aug 25 14:54:52 2015
Total objects stored 4927 (4605 MB) recalled 81 (55 MB)
objects failed to store 467 failed to recall 1 failed to inval 0
objects queried 0 (0 MB) not found 0 = 0.00 %
objects invalidated 548 (490 MB)
This was running 4.1.1-1.
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20150826/0c5c9e12/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list