[gpfsug-discuss] Quotas and non-existant users
Laurence Alexander Hurst
L.A.Hurst at bham.ac.uk
Wed Nov 26 10:14:26 GMT 2014
Hmm, mmrepquota is reporting no files owned by any of the users in
question. I¹ll see if `find` disagrees. They have the default fileset
user quotas applied, so they¹re not users we¹ve edited to grant quota
extensions to. We have had a problem (which IBM have acknowledged, iirc)
whereby it is not possible to reset a user¹s quota back to the default if
it has been modified, perhaps this is related? I¹ll see if `find` turns
anything up or I¹ll raise a ticket with IBM and see what they think.
I¹ve pulled out a single example, but all 75 users I have are the same.
mmrepquota gpfs | grep 8695
8695 nbu USR 0 0 5368709120 0
none | 0 0 0 0 none
8695 bb USR 0 0 1073741824 0
none | 0 0 0 0 none
Thanks for your input.
Laurence
On 25/11/2014 14:00, "Jonathan Buzzard" <jonathan at buzzard.me.uk> wrote:
>On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 10:45 +0000, Laurence Alexander Hurst wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have noticed that once users are deleted (gone entirely from the
>> passwd backend) and all their files removed, their uid is still
>> reported by GPFS¹ quota tools (albeit with zero files and space usage).
>>
>
>There is something somewhere that references them, because they do
>disappear. I know because I cleared out a GPFS file system that had
>files and directories used by "depreciated" user and group names, and
>the check I was using to make sure I had got everything belonging to a
>particular user or group was mmrepquota.
>
>JAB.
>
>--
>Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
>Fife, United Kingdom.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list