<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
Storage Scale is evaluating RHEL10 and aiming to support the new major RHEL10 OS in the early 4Q release of 2025.</div>
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
Please note that this is a tentative support timeline and subject to change at our discretion, and can be adjusted as needed but it's actively being worked.</div>
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@gpfsug.org> on behalf of gpfsug-discuss-request@gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss-request@gpfsug.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, July 24, 2025 4:00 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to<br>
gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org">
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss-5Fgpfsug.org&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=f2vFHEcs16KtZXHu3bLWesJl1sVX22Wf7_kaa86TzO0&m=IHuxpNP4RmdBFZXSqiycctGydLneOMTD4SD9jrWT9KrVgtQgrqC9hPLhfzTWntDS&s=dvdM1gjMQLAMZ9bFSlwI-pbG02IIz-O6nLWvIRuRJpY&e=</a>
<br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
gpfsug-discuss-request@gpfsug.org<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
gpfsug-discuss-owner@gpfsug.org<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: mmdsh rest api command (Jonathan Buzzard)<br>
2. RHEL 10 (Jonathan Buzzard)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:18:07 +0100<br>
From: Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan.buzzard@strath.ac.uk><br>
To: gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org<br>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmdsh rest api command<br>
Message-ID: <28812160-0bdb-4099-83cb-b2688aa1e39b@strath.ac.uk><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<br>
<br>
On 21/07/2025 22:51, Steve Daniels wrote:<br>
> <br>
> There are three different methods (two really) of allowing internode <br>
> communications for the ssh commanding.<br>
> <br>
> Centralized management where select nodes have one way root passwordless <br>
> ssh access to all of the rest of the nodes and n-to-n where all nodes <br>
> have access to all other nodes via passwordless ssh.<br>
> <br>
<br>
When the central administration mode was first introduced you still <br>
needed n-to-n ssh access or it all still fell apart despite being only <br>
able to issue "administration" commands from the central nodes.<br>
<br>
From recollection a slew of what I would call "user" commands (such as <br>
changing an ACL on your *own* files for example) all stopped working <br>
unless the n-to-n was maintained.<br>
<br>
I am not precluding that this had changed in the meantime, but once <br>
bitten twice shy as they say.<br>
<br>
I still maintain reinventing the wheel, which will be a whole bunch of <br>
infrequently tested code paths is a really bad idea in the modern <br>
security threat environment.<br>
<br>
<br>
JAB.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420<br>
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.<br>
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:19:00 +0100<br>
From: Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan.buzzard@strath.ac.uk><br>
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org><br>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] RHEL 10<br>
Message-ID: <391ebb18-b67a-4c96-b678-a0ba990c59de@strath.ac.uk><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<br>
<br>
<br>
Obviously with all the usual caveats etc. is there a timeline for RHEL10 <br>
to be supported?<br>
<br>
<br>
JAB.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420<br>
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.<br>
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org<br>
<a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss-5Fgpfsug.org&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=f2vFHEcs16KtZXHu3bLWesJl1sVX22Wf7_kaa86TzO0&m=IHuxpNP4RmdBFZXSqiycctGydLneOMTD4SD9jrWT9KrVgtQgrqC9hPLhfzTWntDS&s=dvdM1gjMQLAMZ9bFSlwI-pbG02IIz-O6nLWvIRuRJpY&e=</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6<br>
**********************************************<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>