[gpfsug-discuss] gpfsug-discuss RHEL 10

[Michael Taylor]

Storage Scale is evaluating RHEL10 and aiming to support the new major RHEL10 OS in the early 4Q release of 2025.
Please note that this is a tentative support timeline and subject to change at our discretion, and can be adjusted as needed but it's actively being worked.

________________________________
From: gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at gpfsug.org> on behalf of gpfsug-discuss-request at gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss-request at gpfsug.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 4:00 AM
To: gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6

Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to
        gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org 
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        gpfsug-discuss-request at gpfsug.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        gpfsug-discuss-owner at gpfsug.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: mmdsh rest api command (Jonathan Buzzard)
   2. RHEL 10 (Jonathan Buzzard)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:18:07 +0100
From: Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan.buzzard at strath.ac.uk>
To: gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmdsh rest api command
Message-ID: <28812160-0bdb-4099-83cb-b2688aa1e39b at strath.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

On 21/07/2025 22:51, Steve Daniels wrote:
>
> There are three different methods (two really) of allowing internode
> communications for the ssh commanding.
>
> Centralized management where select nodes have one way root passwordless
> ssh access to all of the rest of the nodes and n-to-n where all nodes
> have access to all other nodes via passwordless ssh.
>

When the central administration mode was first introduced you still
needed n-to-n ssh access or it all still fell apart despite being only
able to issue "administration" commands from the central nodes.

 From recollection a slew of what I would call "user" commands (such as
changing an ACL on your *own* files for example) all stopped working
unless the n-to-n was maintained.

I am not precluding that this had changed in the meantime, but once
bitten twice shy as they say.

I still maintain reinventing the wheel, which will be a whole bunch of
infrequently tested code paths is a really bad idea in the modern
security threat environment.


JAB.

--
Jonathan A. Buzzard                         Tel: +44141-5483420
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:19:00 +0100
From: Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan.buzzard at strath.ac.uk>
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] RHEL 10
Message-ID: <391ebb18-b67a-4c96-b678-a0ba990c59de at strath.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed


Obviously with all the usual caveats etc. is there a timeline for RHEL10
to be supported?


JAB.

--
Jonathan A. Buzzard                         Tel: +44141-5483420
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org 


------------------------------

End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6
**********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20250730/90a03751/attachment.htm>