<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I recall looking at this a year or two back. Ganesha is either v4 and v6 both (ie: the encapsulation you see), OR ipv4 ONLY. (ie: /etc/modprobe.d/ipv6.conf disable=1)<code></code><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Ed</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Billich Heinrich Rainer (ID SD) <heinrich.billich@id.ethz.ch><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 13, 2019 10:56 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [gpfsug-discuss] Ganesha all IPv6 sockets - ist this to be expected?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
<div class="PlainText"><br>
Hello,<br>
<br>
I just noted that our ganesha daemons offer IPv6 sockets only, IPv4 traffic gets encapsulated. But all traffic to samba is IPv4, smbd offers both IPv4 and IPv6 sockets.
<br>
I just wonder whether this is to be expected? Protocols support IPv4 only, so why running on IPv6 sockets only for ganesha? Did we configure something wrong and should completely disable IPv6 on the kernel level?<br>
<br>
Any comment is welcome<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Heiner<br>
-- <br>
=======================<br>
Heinrich Billich<br>
ETH Zürich<br>
Informatikdienste<br>
Tel.: +41 44 632 72 56<br>
heinrich.billich@id.ethz.ch<br>
========================<br>
<br>
<br>
I did check with<br>
<br>
ss -l -t -4<br>
ss -l -t -6<br>
<br>
add -p to get the process name, too.<br>
<br>
do you get the same results on your ces nodes?<br>
<br>
<br>
[root@nas22ces04-i config_samples]# ss -l -t -4<br>
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port<br>
LISTEN 0 8192 *:gpfs *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 50 *:netbios-ssn *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 *:5355 *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 *:sunrpc *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 *:ssh *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 100 127.0.0.1:smtp *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 10 10.250.135.24:4379 *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 *:32765 *:*<br>
LISTEN 0 50 *:microsoft-ds *:*<br>
[root@nas22ces04-i config_samples]# ss -l -t -6<br>
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::32767 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::32768 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::32769 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::2049 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::5355 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 50 :::netbios-ssn :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::sunrpc :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::ssh :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 128 :::32765 :::*<br>
LISTEN 0 50 :::microsoft-ds :::*<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br>
<a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>