<html><body><p><font size="2">Think GPFS POOLs ... Generally, you should not mix different kinds of LUNs into the same GPFS POOL.</font><br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=0ABB0EC3DFE783FE8f9e8a93df938690918c0AB@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Lukas Hejtmanek ---07/29/2019 12:12:10 PM---Hello, is there any settings for GPFS 5.x so that you cou"><font size="2" color="#424282">Lukas Hejtmanek ---07/29/2019 12:12:10 PM---Hello, is there any settings for GPFS 5.x so that you could mitigate slow down of</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">07/29/2019 12:12 PM</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">[EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] Asymetric SAN with GPFS</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Sent by: </font><font size="2">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt><font size="2">Hello,<br><br>is there any settings for GPFS 5.x so that you could mitigate slow down of<br>asymmetric SAN? The asymmetric SAN means, that not every LUN has the same<br>speed, or not every disk array has the same number of LUNs. It seems that<br>overal speed is degraded to the slowest LUN. Is there any workaround for this<br>except avoiding that LUN at all?<br><br>-- <br>Lukáš Hejtmánek<br><br>Linux Administrator only because<br> Full Time Multitasking Ninja <br> is not an official job title<br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"> <br><br></font></tt><br><br><BR>
</body></html>