<html><body><p><font size="2">errno 521 is EBADHANDLE (a Linux NFS error); it is not from spectrum scale. </font><br>
<ul><font size="2" face="Courier"><br>/* Defined for the NFSv3 protocol */<br>#define </font><a href="https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v2.6.32/ident/EBADHANDLE#L21"><u><font size="2" color="#0000FF" face="Courier">EBADHANDLE</font></u></a><font size="2" face="Courier"> 521 /* Illegal NFS file handle */</font></ul><br><br><font size="2">Regards, The Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team<br><br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>If you feel that your question can benefit other users of Spectrum Scale (GPFS), then please post it to the public IBM developerWroks Forum at <a href="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/forum?id=11111111-0000-0000-0000-000000000479">https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/forum?id=11111111-0000-0000-0000-000000000479</a>. <br><br>If your query concerns a potential software error in Spectrum Scale (GPFS) and you have an IBM software maintenance contract please contact 1-800-237-5511 in the United States or your local IBM Service Center in other countries. <br><br>The forum is informally monitored as time permits and should not be used for priority messages to the Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team.</font><br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=0ABB0844DFD2C45C8f9e8a93df938690918c0AB@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Brunet Pierre-Marie ---07/26/2018 07:17:25 PM---Hi, We are facing the same issue : we just upgrade o"><font size="2" color="#424282">Brunet Pierre-Marie ---07/26/2018 07:17:25 PM---Hi, We are facing the same issue : we just upgrade our cluster to GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5 with 4</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Brunet Pierre-Marie <pierre-marie.brunet@cnes.fr></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">"gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">07/26/2018 07:17 PM</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5 (Wilson, Neil)</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Sent by: </font><font size="2">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt><font size="2">Hi, <br><br>We are facing the same issue : we just upgrade our cluster to GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5 with 4 gateways servers executing Kernel NFS...<br>=> random "Unknown error 521" on NFS clients.<br><br>Thanks to this thread we decided to downgrade to RHEL 7.4 and (fingers crossed !) up to now, it seems to work properly.<br><br>Is there any official recommendation from IBM on this problem ?<br><br>Regards, <br>PM<br>--<br>HPC center<br>French space agency <br><br>-----Message d'origine-----<br>De : gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org> De la part de gpfsug-discuss-request@spectrumscale.org<br>Envoyé : jeudi 14 juin 2018 13:00<br>À : gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br>Objet : gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 19<br><br>Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to<br> gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> </font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> gpfsug-discuss-request@spectrumscale.org<br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> gpfsug-discuss-owner@spectrumscale.org<br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5 (Tomer Perry)<br> 2. Re: GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5 (Wilson, Neil)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:45:44 +0300<br>From: "Tomer Perry" <TOMP@il.ibm.com><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5<br>Message-ID:<br> <OF826A0F69.C86BD2AB-ONC22582AB.0050FE8E-C22582AB.00511712@notes.na.collabserv.com><br> <br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Please open a service ticket<br><br><br>Regards,<br><br>Tomer Perry<br>Scalable I/O Development (Spectrum Scale)<br>email: tomp@il.ibm.com<br>1 Azrieli Center, Tel Aviv 67021, Israel<br>Global Tel: +1 720 3422758<br>Israel Tel: +972 3 9188625<br>Mobile: +972 52 2554625<br><br><br><br><br>From: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Date: 13/06/2018 13:14<br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5<br>Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org<br><br><br><br>On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:48:14PM +0300, Tomer Perry wrote:<br>> knfs is supported - with or without the cNFS feature ( cNFS will add <br>> HA<br><br>> to NFS on top of GPFS -<br>> <br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.1/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r01.doc/bl1adv_cnfs.htm">https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.1/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r01.doc/bl1adv_cnfs.htm</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"> <br><br>> ).<br>> <br>> knfs and cNFS can't coexist with CES in the same environment.<br><br>well, I use knfs and no CNFS n RHEL 7.5 and getting mentioned issues.<br><br>--<br>Luk?? Hejtm?nek<br><br>Linux Administrator only because<br> Full Time Multitasking Ninja<br> is not an official job title<br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <</font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20180613/3cf6fbce/attachment-0001.html">http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20180613/3cf6fbce/attachment-0001.html</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2">><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:14:53 +0000<br>From: "Wilson, Neil" <neil.wilson@metoffice.gov.uk><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5<br>Message-ID:<br> <VI1PR01MB3869195DA7652219D5E3C6FDC67E0@VI1PR01MB3869.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com><br> <br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>We are running a cNFS on GPFS 4.2.3-9 on 7.4 and kernel version 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64 and are not having any errors.<br>So it's probably just GPFS not being ready for 7.5 yet.<br><br>Neil.<br><br>Neil Wilson? Senior IT Practitioner<br>Storage, Virtualisation and Mainframe Team?? IT Services<br>Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom<br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org> On Behalf Of Jonathan Buzzard<br>Sent: 13 June 2018 10:33<br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3-9 and RHEL 7.5<br><br>On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 11:10 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:<br>> Hello,<br>> <br>> did anyone encountered an error with RHEL 7.5 kernel 3.10.0-<br>> 862.3.2.el7.x86_64 and the latest GPFS 4.2.3-9 with kernel NFS?<br>> <br>> I'm getting random errors: Unknown error 521. It means EBADHANDLE.<br>> Not sure whether it is due to kernel or GPFS.<br>> <br><br>GPFS being not supported on 7.5 at this time would be the starting point. I am also under the impression that kernel NFS was not supported either it's Ganesha or nothing.<br><br>The interim fix is probably to downgrade to a 7.4 kernel. Certainly in the past that has worked for me.<br><br>JAB.<br><br>--<br>Jonathan A. Buzzard?????????????????????????Tel: +44141-5483420 HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.<br>University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br><br><br>End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 77, Issue 19<br>**********************************************<br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br><br></font></tt><br><br><BR>
</body></html>