<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" ><div>I checked the <strong>draft</strong> documentation for 4.2.3, and here is the list of what is planned.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As usual -- please remember this is an Intention not a commitment, and subject to change between now and the release.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>regards,<br>Carl</div>
<div> </div>
<dl> <dt accesskey="Y" id="vcc_sp_dt_367" tabindex="341" >-Y option</dt> <dd id="vcc_sp_dd_368" tabindex="342" > <div id="vcc_sp_div_369" tabindex="343" >Added the -Y option to the following commands:
<div accesskey="Y" id="vcc_sp_div_371" tabindex="345" > <table frame="void" id="soa__table_nyc_4zq_gz" rules="none" summary="" tabindex="346" border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" > <tbody id="vcc_sp_tbody_372" > <tr id="vcc_sp_tr_373" > <td id="vcc_sp_td_374" tabindex="347" >mmblock</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_376" tabindex="349" >mmhealth</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_378" tabindex="351" >mmlsfileset</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_380" tabindex="353" >mmlsnodeclass</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_382" tabindex="355" >mmnetverify</td> </tr> <tr id="vcc_sp_tr_384" > <td id="vcc_sp_td_385" tabindex="357" >mmcloudgateway</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_387" tabindex="359" >mmkeyserv</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_389" tabindex="361" >mmlsfs</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_391" tabindex="363" >mmlsnsd</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_393" tabindex="365" >mmnfs</td> </tr> <tr id="vcc_sp_tr_395" > <td id="vcc_sp_td_396" tabindex="367" >mmdf</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_398" tabindex="369" >mmlscluster</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_400" tabindex="371" >mmlslicense</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_402" tabindex="373" >mmlspolicy</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_404" tabindex="375" >mmrepquota</td> </tr> <tr id="vcc_sp_tr_406" > <td id="vcc_sp_td_407" tabindex="377" >mmdiag</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_409" tabindex="379" >mmlsconfig</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_411" tabindex="381" >mmlsmgr</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_413" tabindex="383" >mmlsquota</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_415" tabindex="385" >mmsmb</td> </tr> <tr id="vcc_sp_tr_417" > <td id="vcc_sp_td_418" tabindex="387" >mmgetstate</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_420" tabindex="389" >mmlsdisk</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_422" tabindex="391" >mmlsmount</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_424" tabindex="393" >mmlssnapshot</td> <td id="vcc_sp_td_426" tabindex="395" >mmuserauth</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </dd></dl></div>
<div dir="ltr" ><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" >
<div><br>Carl Zetie<br>Offering Manager for Spectrum Scale, IBM<br>carlz@us.ibm.com</div></div></div></div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<blockquote data-history-content-modified="1" dir="ltr" style="border-left:solid #aaaaaa 2px; margin-left:5px; padding-left:5px; direction:ltr; margin-right:0px" >----- Original message -----<br>From: gpfsug-discuss-request@spectrumscale.org<br>Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org<br>To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br>Cc:<br>Subject: gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 62, Issue 70<br>Date: Tue, Mar 28, 2017 12:38 PM<br>
<div><font face="Default Monospace,Courier New,Courier,monospace" size="2" >Send gpfsug-discuss mailing list submissions to<br>gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss" target="_blank" >http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>gpfsug-discuss-request@spectrumscale.org<br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br>gpfsug-discuss-owner@spectrumscale.org<br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of gpfsug-discuss digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> (Luis Bolinches)<br> 2. Re: -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> (Jonathon A Anderson)<br> 3. Re: -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> (Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services))<br> 4. Re: -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> (Jonathon A Anderson)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:22:04 +0000<br>From: "Luis Bolinches" <luis.bolinches@fi.ibm.com><br>To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br>Cc: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious<br>few officially!<br>Message-ID:<br><OF1049606E.44BBC8FA-ON002580F1.0059D11B-002580F1.0059E971@notes.na.collabserv.com><br><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20170328/694119bd/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank" >http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20170328/694119bd/attachment-0001.html</a>><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:24:19 +0000<br>From: Jonathon A Anderson <jonathon.anderson@colorado.edu><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious<br>few officially!<br>Message-ID: <99B1AC2E-91B4-4A7F-B270-8FDDC49918EA@colorado.edu><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Looks great. I look forward to its maturity.<br><br>~jonathon<br><br><br>On 3/28/17, 10:22 AM, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of Luis Bolinches" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of luis.bolinches@fi.ibm.com> wrote:<br><br> Hi<br> <br> While I understand the frustration of tiem that could be used otherwise. depending of what you are plannig with script wrapping I would recommend you seriously take a look to the REST API<br> <br> <a href="http://files.gpfsug.org/presentations/2017/Ehningen/23_-_SSUG17DE_-_Alexander_Wolf-Reber_-_Spectrum_Scale_ReST_API.pdf" target="_blank" >http://files.gpfsug.org/presentations/2017/Ehningen/23_-_SSUG17DE_-_Alexander_Wolf-Reber_-_Spectrum_Scale_ReST_API.pdf</a><br> <br> --<br> Yst?v?llisin terveisin / Kind regards / Saludos cordiales / Salutations<br> <br> Luis Bolinches<br> Lab Services<br> <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/services/labservices" target="_blank" >http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/services/labservices</a>/<br> <br> IBM Laajalahdentie 23 (main Entrance) Helsinki, 00330 Finland<br> Phone: +358 503112585<br> <br> "If you continually give you will continually have." Anonymous<br> <br> <br> <br> ----- Original message -----<br> From: Jonathon A Anderson <jonathon.anderson@colorado.edu><br> Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org<br> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br> Cc:<br> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> Date: Tue, Mar 28, 2017 7:17 PM<br> <br> I had a bit of a run-in with a gpfs developer at a conference once when I complained about how command output changes frequently, breaking customer scripts. He was confused why we weren?t<br> using `-Y`, and didn?t believe me that it?s simply not documented anywhere!<br> <br> `-Y` output is essential for interfacing programmatically with GPFS, and I don?t understand why it?s not mentioned in any of the guides or manpages. (Though apparently, according to this thead, it?s since appeared in some newer manpages.)<br> <br> ~jonathon<br> <br> <br> On 3/28/17, 10:14 AM, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of Marc A Kaplan" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of makaplan@us.ibm.com> wrote:<br> <br> Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth.<br> <br> But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields "interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands. <br> Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that can be parsed by simple programs.<br> <br> I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats will not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if you're going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing the -Y output,<br> even if that is not officially supported. <br> <br> <br> <br> _______________________________________________<br> gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br> <a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss" target="_blank" >http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a><br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> Ellei edell? ole toisin mainittu: / Unless stated otherwise above:<br> Oy IBM Finland Ab<br> PL 265, 00101 Helsinki, Finland<br> Business ID, Y-tunnus: 0195876-3<br> Registered in Finland<br> <br> <br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:37:12 +0000<br>From: "Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)"<br><S.J.Thompson@bham.ac.uk><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious<br>few officially!<br>Message-ID: <D5004FA9.399EC%s.j.thompson@bham.ac.uk><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>I thought the header rows defined what the format of the output was. Its a bit weird as there can be multiple header rows for different content rows ...<br><br>Simon<br><br>From: <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org<<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org" target="_blank" >mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</a>>> on behalf of Marc A Kaplan <makaplan@us.ibm.com<<a href="mailto:makaplan@us.ibm.com" target="_blank" >mailto:makaplan@us.ibm.com</a>>><br>Reply-To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" target="_blank" >mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" target="_blank" >mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>>><br>Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14<br>To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" target="_blank" >mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" target="_blank" >mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>>><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br><br>Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth.<br><br>But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields "interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands.<br>Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that can be parsed by simple programs.<br><br>I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats will not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if you're going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing the -Y output, even if that is not officially supported.<br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <<a href="http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20170328/2c551c41/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank" >http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/attachments/20170328/2c551c41/attachment-0001.html</a>><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:37:47 +0000<br>From: Jonathon A Anderson <jonathon.anderson@colorado.edu><br>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious<br>few officially!<br>Message-ID: <DEB4F27D-8814-4514-AC65-D5DA4F55178B@colorado.edu><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Sure; but that only helps if you know the flag even exists.<br><br>~jonathon<br><br><br>On 3/28/17, 10:37 AM, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org on behalf of S.J.Thompson@bham.ac.uk> wrote:<br><br> I thought the header rows defined what the format of the output was. Its a bit weird as there can be multiple header rows for different content rows ...<br> <br> <br> Simon<br> <br> <br> From: <gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Marc A Kaplan <makaplan@us.ibm.com><br> Reply-To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br> Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14<br> To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!<br> <br> <br> <br> Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth.<br> <br> But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields "interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands. <br> Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that can be parsed by simple programs.<br> <br> I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats will not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if you're going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing the -Y output,<br> even if that is not officially supported. <br> <br> <br> <br> <br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<br><a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss" target="_blank" >http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a><br><br><br>End of gpfsug-discuss Digest, Vol 62, Issue 70<br>**********************************************</font><br> </div></blockquote>
<div dir="ltr" > </div></div></div><BR>