<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi Olaf,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">The filesystem manager runs on one of our servers, all of which are upgraded to 4.2.2.x.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Also, I didn’t mention this yesterday but our /etc/nsswitch.conf has “files” listed first for /etc/group.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">In addition to a mixture of GPFS versions, we also have a mixture of OS versions (RHEL 6/7). AFAIK tell with all of my testing / experimenting the only factor that seems to change the behavior of mmrepquota in regards to GIDs versus group names
is the GPFS version.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Other ideas, anyone? Is anyone else in a similar situation and can test whether they see similar behavior?</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Thanks...</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Kevin</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Olaf Weiser <<a href="mailto:olaf.weiser@de.ibm.com" class="">olaf.weiser@de.ibm.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class=""><font size="2" face="sans-serif" class="">have you checked, where th fsmgr runs as you have nodes with different code levels</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="2" face="sans-serif" class="">mmlsmgr </font><br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif" class="">From: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif" class="">"Buterbaugh, Kevin L" <<a href="mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh@Vanderbilt.Edu" class="">Kevin.Buterbaugh@Vanderbilt.Edu</a>></font><br class="">
<font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif" class="">To: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif" class="">gpfsug main discussion list <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" class="">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>></font><br class="">
<font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif" class="">Date: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif" class="">01/18/2017 04:57 PM</font><br class="">
<font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif" class="">Subject: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif" class="">[gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x</font><br class="">
<font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif" class="">Sent by: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif" class=""><a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org" class="">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</a></font><br class="">
<hr noshade="" class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">Hi All, </font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">We recently upgraded our cluster (well, the servers are all upgraded; the clients are still in progress) from GPFS 4.2.1.1 to GPFS 4.2.2.1 and there appears to be a change in how mmrepquota handles group names in its’ output. I’m trying
to get a handle on it, because it is messing with some of my scripts and - more importantly - because I don’t understand the behavior.</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">From one of my clients which is still running GPFS 4.2.1.1 I can run an “mmrepquota -g <fs>” and if the group exists in /etc/group the group name is displayed. Of course, if the group doesn’t exist in /etc/group, the GID is displayed.
Makes sense.</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">However, on my servers which have been upgraded to GPFS 4.2.2.1 most - but not all - of the time I see GID numbers instead of group names. My question is, what is the criteria GPFS 4.2.2.x is using to decide when to display a GID instead
of a group name? It’s apparently *not* the length of the name of the group, because I have output in front of me where a 13 character long group name is displayed but a 7 character long group name is *not* displayed - its’ GID is instead (and yes, both exist
in /etc/group).</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">I know that sample output would be useful to illustrate this, but I do not want to post group names or GIDs to a public mailing list … if you want to know what those are, you’ll have to ask Vladimir Putin… ;-)</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">I am in the process of updating scripts to use “mmrepquota -gn <fs>” and then looking up the group name myself, but I want to try to understand this. Thanks…</font><br class="">
<br class="">
<font size="3" class="">Kevin</font><br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">—</div>
<div class="">Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator</div>
<div class="">Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education</div>
<div class=""><a href="mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu" class="">Kevin.Buterbaugh@vanderbilt.edu</a> - (615)875-9633</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>