<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>I was going to ask about this, I recall it being mentioned about "grandfathering" and also having mixed deployments.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Would that mean you could per TB license one set of NSD servers (hosting only 1 FS) that co-existed in a cluster with other traditionally licensed systems?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I would see having NSDs with different license models hosting the same FS being problematic, but if it were a different file-system?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Simon</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</a>> on behalf of Daniel Kidger <<a href="mailto:daniel.kidger@uk.ibm.com">daniel.kidger@uk.ibm.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, 7 December 2016 at 12:36<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Strategies - servers with local SAS disks<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none;">The
new volume based licensing option is I agree quite pricey per TB at first sight, but it could make some configuration choice, a lot cheaper than they used to be under the Client:FPO:Server model.</span></span>
</body>
</html>