<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Title" content="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:宋体;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:__;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Helvetica;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN">In general, yes, it's common practice to do the 'rolling upgrades'. If I had to do my whole cluster at once, with an outage, I'd probably never upgrade. :)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN">Bob Oesterlin<br>
Sr Storage Engineer, Nuance HPC Grid<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From: </span></b><span style="color:black"><gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of "Sobey, Richard A" <r.sobey@imperial.ac.uk><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, August 15, 2016 at 4:59 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>"'gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org'" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] Minor GPFS versions coexistence problems?</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">If I wanted to upgrade my NSD nodes one at a time from 3.5.0.22 to 3.5.0.27 (or whatever the latest in that branch is) am I ok to stagger it over a few days, perhaps up to 2 weeks or will I run into problems if they’re
on different versions?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Richard<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>