<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>
<div>I guess this is really my question. Budget is less than $50k per site and they need around 20TB storage. Two nodes with MD3 or something may work. But could it work (and be successful) with just servers and internal drives? Should I do FPO for non
hadoop like workloads? I didn’t think I could get native raid except in the ESS (GSS no longer exists if I remember correctly). Do I just make replicas and call it good?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mark</div>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss-bounces@spectrumscale.org</a>> on behalf of Marc A Kaplan <<a href="mailto:makaplan@us.ibm.com">makaplan@us.ibm.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span>gpfsug main discussion list <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Friday, March 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>gpfsug main discussion list <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org">gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Small cluster<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Jon, I don't doubt your experience, but it's not quite fair or even sensible to make a decision today based on what was available in the GPFS 2.3 era.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">We are now at GPFS 4.2 with support for 3 way replication and FPO. </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Also we have Raid controllers, IB, and "Native Raid" and ESS, GSS solutions and more.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">So more choices, more options, making finding an "optimal" solution more difficult.<br>
</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">To begin with, as with any provisioning problem, one should try to state: requirements, goals, budgets, constraints, failure/tolerance models/assumptions,</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">expected workloads, desired performance, etc, etc.</font><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</span>
<p style="font-size:8pt; line-height:10pt; font-family: 'Cambria','times roman',serif;">
This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. This message may be viewed by parties at Sirius Computer Solutions other than those named in
the message header. This message does not contain an official representation of Sirius Computer Solutions. If you have received this communication in error, notify Sirius Computer Solutions immediately and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete
this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. </p>
<span style="padding-top:10px; font-weight:bold; color:#CC0000; font-size:10pt; font-family: 'Calibri',Arial,sans-serif; "><a href="http://www.siriuscom.com">Sirius Computer Solutions</a></span>
<div></div>
</body>
</html>