<div dir="ltr">Thanks Jamie. I appreciate the input. Glad to hear it.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:23 AM, James Davis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jamiedavis@us.ibm.com" target="_blank">jamiedavis@us.ibm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>
<p><tt><font size="2">Zach,</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Not sure if I'm formatting this message properly (need to switch off of digest mode), but I know of no plans to replace the GPFS command line interface with a GUI. With the GPFS GUI, TPC monitoring, etc., we want to enable a wider variety of users to effectively use and manage GPFS, but the command line will of course remain available for power users, script-writers, etc. I certainly don't intend to throw away any of my nice mm-themed test programs :-)</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Jamie Davis</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">GPFS Test</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:05:11 -0400<span class=""><br>
From: Zachary Giles <<a href="mailto:zgiles@gmail.com" target="_blank">zgiles@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: gpfsug main discussion list <<a href="mailto:gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org" target="_blank">gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org</a>><br></span><span class="">
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Monitoring capacity and health status<br>
for a multitude of GPFS clusters<br></span>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAMYZk=eaQpwRcW6RM7WK9x4v8wO=o=GmZPrjCCq=<a href="mailto:dKa9K7H4Bg@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">dKa9K7H4Bg@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<span class=""><br>
<br>
Thanks for your replies. I can definitely appreciate the the goal of<br>
improving management of components, and I agree that if GPFS will be using<br>
within other products (which it is and will continue to be), then it would<br>
be great for those products to be able to manage GPFS via an interface.<br>
<br>
My fear with the idea of the above mentioned as a prereq is that the<br>
"improvement" of management might looks like an improvement when you only<br>
have 1 or 2 tiers of storage and 1 or 2 filesets called "database" and<br>
another fileset called "user files", but if you have hundreds or thousands<br>
of filesets and several tiers of storage, with both GSS and non-GSS systems<br>
in the same cluster, then the GUI may actually be more cumbersome than the<br>
original method. So, I just want to voice an opinion that we should<br>
continue to be able to configure / maintain / monitor GPFS in a programatic<br>
/ scriptable non-point-and-click way, if possible.<br>
</span></font></tt><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Jamie Davis<br>
GPFS Functional Verification Test (FVT)<br>
<a href="mailto:jamiedavis@us.ibm.com" target="_blank">jamiedavis@us.ibm.com</a></font><br>
</p></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
gpfsug-discuss mailing list<br>
gpfsug-discuss at <a href="http://gpfsug.org" target="_blank">gpfsug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss" target="_blank">http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Zach Giles<br><a href="mailto:zgiles@gmail.com">zgiles@gmail.com</a></div>
</div>